| *** tpb has joined #symbiflow | 00:00 | |
| litghost | long time | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| litghost | I agree that get_nodes is the likely culprit again | 00:05 |
| litghost | there is more happening in that tcl though | 00:05 |
| litghost | might be worth breaking up the sites from the tiles | 00:06 |
| litghost | or something along those lines | 00:06 |
| litghost | there are some straight forward split points | 00:06 |
| nats` | yep what I'm looking :) | 00:06 |
| nats` | and in fact it seems the tcl interpreter from vivado is even worse than I thought | 00:06 |
| nats` | unsetting vars for example doesn't seem to free memory at all.... | 00:07 |
| nats` | at least for those I tested get_nodes get_pips get_tiles etc.... | 00:07 |
| nats` | litghost, I realized something could be broken in my 072 fuzzer ! | 00:42 |
| nats` | easy to fix | 00:42 |
| nats` | if the number of pips is not always a multiple of 64 | 00:43 |
| litghost | ah | 00:49 |
| nats` | the artix works because the numbe rof pips is 64n | 00:51 |
| nats` | I wrote a patch I'll test it against artix to verify it works and I would like to test against other target is it possible ? | 00:51 |
| nats` | ok I can test with kintex | 01:15 |
| nats` | I do it right now | 01:16 |
| nats` | litghost, do you have the sha1 of kintex file ? | 01:20 |
| litghost | I don't have one handy | 01:24 |
| nats` | I fixed it for non integer multiple | 01:25 |
| nats` | it doesn't totally optimize you can end with a last block of few index to browse but it shouldn't matter a lot | 01:25 |
| mithro | nats`: Do you have to call the gc in some way? | 01:56 |
| nats` | nop | 02:02 |
| nats` | I simply start new instance of vivado | 02:02 |
| nats` | mithro, you don't have the fuzzer 072 built for kintex with file ? | 02:03 |
| nats` | real 41m2,012s | 02:05 |
| nats` | user 135m58,549s | 02:05 |
| nats` | sys 22m59,056s | 02:05 |
| nats` | time to build 072 for kintex 70 | 02:05 |
| nats` | (env) nats@nats-MS-7A72:~/project/symbiflow/prjxray/fuzzers/072-ordered_wires$ sha1sum build/specimen_001/downhill_wires.txt | 02:06 |
| nats` | c32830d20ab25241eb560fa3c96302532f5e037a build/specimen_001/downhill_wires.txt | 02:06 |
| nats` | (env) nats@nats-MS-7A72:~/project/symbiflow/prjxray/fuzzers/072-ordered_wires$ sha1sum build/specimen_001/uphill_wires.txt | 02:06 |
| nats` | 490f19862d57c506a4ed7a945c295d2bcc73fceb build/specimen_001/uphill_wires.txt | 02:06 |
| nats` | I'll open a new PR with the fix to be tested | 02:06 |
| nats` | is there a lighter way to push a fix than a PR ? | 02:11 |
| mithro | nats`: What is so heavy weight about a PR? | 02:15 |
| nats` | nothing really heavy but I was wondering when you have to push a small fix of few lines if there are other ways | 02:16 |
| *** citypw has joined #symbiflow | 02:19 | |
| nats` | mithro litghost https://github.com/SymbiFlow/prjxray/pull/507 | 02:24 |
| tpb | Title: Fixing Fuzzer 072: supporting all pips count by natsfr · Pull Request #507 · SymbiFlow/prjxray · GitHub (at github.com) | 02:24 |
| nats` | if this one is confirmed I'll continue on 074 | 02:25 |
| nats` | I realized my mistake while working on that one | 02:26 |
| nats` | because it has odd num of tiles :D | 02:26 |
| nats` | mithro, I restarted a kintex test with the change you told me | 03:05 |
| nats` | but I'll go to sleep it's 4am here :D | 03:05 |
| nats` | will push that tomorrow | 03:05 |
| mithro | nats`: Yes, sounds like a good idea! | 03:07 |
| *** _whitelogger has quit IRC | 05:24 | |
| *** _whitelogger has joined #symbiflow | 05:27 | |
| nats` | good morning | 09:30 |
| nats` | finishing to fix the 072 mistake I made it should be good after | 10:03 |
| nats` | for a reason I don't understand near the end python only made thread one by one oO | 10:51 |
| nats` | real 51m48,687s | 10:51 |
| nats` | user 138m34,724s | 10:51 |
| nats` | sys 23m25,369s | 10:51 |
| nats` | litghost, mithro it should be good now sorry for the mistake :) | 11:58 |
| *** Qbix_ has joined #symbiflow | 16:04 | |
| Qbix_ | hi all | 16:33 |
| digshadow | hi Qbix_ | 19:01 |
| *** Rahix has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
| *** Rahix has joined #symbiflow | 19:43 | |
| *** Rahix_ has joined #symbiflow | 19:53 | |
| *** Rahix has quit IRC | 19:54 | |
| *** _whitelogger has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
| *** _whitelogger has joined #symbiflow | 21:06 | |
| *** Qbix_ has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
| nats` | litghost, are you here ? I just came back home and I have question about your change request | 21:43 |
| *** Rahix_ has quit IRC | 22:35 | |
| nats` | ping litghost you accepted change but I'm not sure it's good I still doesn't understand what you suggested | 23:07 |
| nats` | I just saw the comment oky :) | 23:17 |
| nats` | someone could test that fuzzer to have a definitive answer :) | 23:17 |
| nats` | I want to know if in all case it generates the same file as former fuzzer | 23:17 |
| nats` | I made an other run with the kintex and it took about 39 minutes | 23:25 |
| nats` | so maybe at one time because of cpu use the pool was used differently | 23:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.13.1 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!